| Peer-Reviewed

Urban Agriculture in Arusha City, Tanzania: Misconceptions and Realities

Received: 21 July 2021     Accepted: 2 August 2021     Published: 11 August 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Like many cities in Sub-Saharan Africa, urban agriculture in Arusha city is perceived differently by urban land decision makers, agricultural and environmental officers as well as urban farmers. The way urban agriculture is perceived changes depending on urbanization rate and institutional framework of cities’ authorities. Despite that situation, information on how positive perception can lead to the prosperity of urban agriculture or its negative perception can hinder its prosperity is still implicit. Thus, this study was conducted to examine the perception held by urban farmers and officials in Arusha city and the way such perceptions affect urban agricultural activities. The study adopted a qualitative research approach in order to gain the in-depth respondents’ opinions and perceptual information about urban agriculture. The case study strategy was deployed by this study because the perceptional thoughts held by respondents on urban agriculture depend on the actual situation through which agricultural activities took place. A total of 60 respondents were exhaustively interviewed. Other information was obtained through observation as well as reviewing literature. All data obtained were analyzed and interpreted based on their content. The findings revealed that some of the negative effects caused by urban agricultural activities influenced the negative perception people held on it. Those effects were seldom managed by officials from Arusha city authorities. However, some of those effects to the environment and urban development were evident, they were sometimes exaggerated due to the negative perception already existing in the city officials’ minds. The positive perception of urban agriculture existed only when its associated benefits met the interests of the urban farmers and city officials. The study concludes that, the positive or negative perceptions of urban agriculture has close a relationship with the livelihoods of the farmers and the employment needs of officials such as urban planners, environmental officers and agricultural officers. Despite urban agriculture being somehow acknowledged in the policy documents, the effects of negative perceptions among different stakeholders about urban agriculture are considered less crucial in the policy implication and other formal governmental proclamation. However, in the reality it is critical.

Published in Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.urp.20210603.12
Page(s) 82-89
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Urban Agriculture, Perception, Misconceptions, Realities

References
[1] Appeaning, A. K. (2010). Urban and peri-urban agriculture in developing countries studied using remote sensing and in situ methods. Remote Sensing, 2 (2), 497-513.
[2] Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, California State University, Long Beach, California.
[3] Cancela, J. (2009). Urban agriculture in city planning process. The Portuguese Experience. In 45th ISOCARP Congress [www.isocarp.net]. Site visited on 14th September, 2018.
[4] Carr, A., Zylmans, A., Drozdzik, C., Vena, M. and Finkelstein, N. (2014). Public perceptions of urban agriculture’s positionality in Vancouver, Canada. [www.lmnhs.bc.ca]. Accessed on 8th May, 2020.
[5] Chimbwanda, F. (2016). Perceptions and attitudes of participants toward urban gardening. A case study of nutrition gardens in Mucheke Town, Masvingo. Zimbabwe Open University, (8) (8). (www.iiste.org) Site visited on 21st December, 2018.
[6] Fasth, T. (2019). Decision analysis in situations with conflicting interests; Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University.
[7] Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations (FAO-UN). (2012). The State of Food and Agriculture: Investing in Agriculture for a Better Future [www.fao.org] Site visited on 16th May, 2018.
[8] Freeman, D. B. (1991). A city of farmers: Informal urban agriculture in the open spaces of Nairobi, Kenya. McGill-Queen’s Press, Montreal, Canada.
[9] Hallett, S., Hoagland, L., Toner, E., Gradziel, T. M., Mitchell, C. A. and Whipkey, A. L. (2016). Urban agriculture: environmental, economic, and social perspectives. Horticultural reviews, 44, 65-120.
[10] Halloran, A., & Magid, J. (2013). Planning the unplanned: incorporating agriculture as an urban land use into the Dar es Salaam Master Plan and Beyond. Environment and Urbanization, 25 (2), 541-558.
[11] Hamisi, R. (2012). Contribution of urban agriculture to food security: A case study of Sombetini, Daraja Mbili, and Sokon one wards, in Arusha city, University of University of Dar es Salaam, School of Law, Tanzania.
[12] Horst, M., McClintock, N. and Hoey, L. (2017). The intersection of planning, urban agriculture, and food justice: A review of the literature. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83 (3), 277-295.
[13] Ives, C. D & Kendal, D. (2013). Values and attitudes of the urban public towards peri-urban agricultural land. Land use policy, 34, 80-90.
[14] Kopiyawattage, K. P., Warner, L. and Roberts, T. G. (2019). Understanding urban food producers’ intention to continue farming in urban settings. Urban agriculture & regional food systems, 4 (1), 21-37.
[15] Kutiwa, S., Boon, E., & Devuyst, D. (2010). Urban Agriculture in low income households of Harare: an adaptive response to economic crisis. Journal of Human Ecology, 32 (2), 85-96.
[16] Lee-Smith, D. (2010). Cities feeding people: an update on urban agriculture in Equatorial Africa. Environment and Urbanization, 22 (2), 483-499.
[17] Lovell, S. T. (2010). Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States. Sustainability, 2 (8), 2499-2522.
[18] Magigi, W. (2013). Urbanization and its impacts to food systems and environmental sustainability in urban space: Evidence from urban agriculture livelihoods in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of environmental protection. 13, 1138-1148.
[19] Magigi. W. (2008). Improving urban land governance with emphasize of integration of urban agriculture based livelihoods in spatial land use planning practices in Tanzania. Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
[20] McClintock, N; Miewald, C., & McCann, E. (2018). The politics of urban agriculture: Sustainability, governance and contestation. In the Routledge handbook on urban space politics, 361-374.
[21] Mkwela, H. S. (2013). Urban agriculture in Dar es Salaam: a dream or reality?. Sustainable Development and Planning VI, 173, 161.
[22] Monica, R. and Varsha, G. (2018). Transforming urban farming approaches to achieve the SDGs. [www.oaji.net/articles]. Site visited on 9th August, 2020.
[23] Mosha, A. C. (2015). Urban Agriculture in Botswana. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 48-67.
[24] Nuhu, S. (2018). Peri-Urban Land Governance in Developing Countries: Understanding the Role, Interaction and Power Relation among Actors in Tanzania. In Urban Forum, Springer Netherlands.
[25] Obosu, M. K. (2002). Changes in official attitudes towards urban agriculture in Accra. African Studies Quarterly, 6 (3), 19-32.
[26] Okoro, E., Tarinabo, I. N., Ibe, A. H. and Martin, N. C. (2017). Environmental and economic perception of urban farming in Aba, Nigeria. International journal of environmental chemistry, 2 (5), 73-80.
[27] Owusu, V., Bakang, J. E. A., Abaidoo, R. C. and Kinane, M. L. (2012). Perception on untreated wastewater irrigation for vegetable production in Ghana. Environment, development and sustainability, 14 (1), 135-150.
[28] Poulsen, M. (2015). They got corn out here in the heart of the Ghetto? Community perceptions of urban farming in Baltimore, Maryland. Doctoral Dissertation, at Johns Hopkins University. [jscholarship.library.jhu.edu] Site visited on 29th January 2020.
[29] Quon, S. (1999). Planning for urban agriculture: A review of tools and strategies for urban planners. Cities feeding people series; 28. Accessed on 11th September, 2018.
[30] Schmidt, S. (2012). Getting the policy right: urban agriculture in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. International Development Planning Review, 34 (2), 129-145.
[31] Sharma, V. P. (2015). Dynamics of land use competition in India: Perceptions and realities. [www.vslir.iima.ac.in]. Accessed on 17th July, 2020.
[32] United Republic of Tanzania (URT). (1995), National Land Policy, The Ministry of Lands, Housing and Human Settlement Development, Tanzania.
[33] United Republic of Tanzania (URT). (2000), National Human Settlements Development Policy, The Ministry of Lands, Housing and Human Settlements Development, Tanzania.
[34] United Republic of Tanzania (URT). (2007). Land Use Planning Act, 2007. Government Printer, Dar es Salaam.
[35] United Republic of Tanzania (URT). (2018). The Urban Planning (Urban Farming) Regulations, The Ministry of Lands, Housing and Human Settlements Development, Tanzania.
[36] Wegedie, K. T. (2018). The Impact of urban expansion on the livelihood of farming communities in peri-urban area of Bahir Dar City Amahara, Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 9 (9).
[37] Zeeuw, H., Guendel, S., & Waibel, H. (2000). The integration of agriculture in urban policies. Growing cities, growing food. Urban Agriculture policy 161-180.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Pastory Salvatory Thomas, Wilbard Jackson Kombe, Aldo Lupala. (2021). Urban Agriculture in Arusha City, Tanzania: Misconceptions and Realities. Urban and Regional Planning, 6(3), 82-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210603.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Pastory Salvatory Thomas; Wilbard Jackson Kombe; Aldo Lupala. Urban Agriculture in Arusha City, Tanzania: Misconceptions and Realities. Urban Reg. Plan. 2021, 6(3), 82-89. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20210603.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Pastory Salvatory Thomas, Wilbard Jackson Kombe, Aldo Lupala. Urban Agriculture in Arusha City, Tanzania: Misconceptions and Realities. Urban Reg Plan. 2021;6(3):82-89. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20210603.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.urp.20210603.12,
      author = {Pastory Salvatory Thomas and Wilbard Jackson Kombe and Aldo Lupala},
      title = {Urban Agriculture in Arusha City, Tanzania: Misconceptions and Realities},
      journal = {Urban and Regional Planning},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {82-89},
      doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20210603.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210603.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20210603.12},
      abstract = {Like many cities in Sub-Saharan Africa, urban agriculture in Arusha city is perceived differently by urban land decision makers, agricultural and environmental officers as well as urban farmers. The way urban agriculture is perceived changes depending on urbanization rate and institutional framework of cities’ authorities. Despite that situation, information on how positive perception can lead to the prosperity of urban agriculture or its negative perception can hinder its prosperity is still implicit. Thus, this study was conducted to examine the perception held by urban farmers and officials in Arusha city and the way such perceptions affect urban agricultural activities. The study adopted a qualitative research approach in order to gain the in-depth respondents’ opinions and perceptual information about urban agriculture. The case study strategy was deployed by this study because the perceptional thoughts held by respondents on urban agriculture depend on the actual situation through which agricultural activities took place. A total of 60 respondents were exhaustively interviewed. Other information was obtained through observation as well as reviewing literature. All data obtained were analyzed and interpreted based on their content. The findings revealed that some of the negative effects caused by urban agricultural activities influenced the negative perception people held on it. Those effects were seldom managed by officials from Arusha city authorities. However, some of those effects to the environment and urban development were evident, they were sometimes exaggerated due to the negative perception already existing in the city officials’ minds. The positive perception of urban agriculture existed only when its associated benefits met the interests of the urban farmers and city officials. The study concludes that, the positive or negative perceptions of urban agriculture has close a relationship with the livelihoods of the farmers and the employment needs of officials such as urban planners, environmental officers and agricultural officers. Despite urban agriculture being somehow acknowledged in the policy documents, the effects of negative perceptions among different stakeholders about urban agriculture are considered less crucial in the policy implication and other formal governmental proclamation. However, in the reality it is critical.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Urban Agriculture in Arusha City, Tanzania: Misconceptions and Realities
    AU  - Pastory Salvatory Thomas
    AU  - Wilbard Jackson Kombe
    AU  - Aldo Lupala
    Y1  - 2021/08/11
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210603.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.urp.20210603.12
    T2  - Urban and Regional Planning
    JF  - Urban and Regional Planning
    JO  - Urban and Regional Planning
    SP  - 82
    EP  - 89
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1697
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210603.12
    AB  - Like many cities in Sub-Saharan Africa, urban agriculture in Arusha city is perceived differently by urban land decision makers, agricultural and environmental officers as well as urban farmers. The way urban agriculture is perceived changes depending on urbanization rate and institutional framework of cities’ authorities. Despite that situation, information on how positive perception can lead to the prosperity of urban agriculture or its negative perception can hinder its prosperity is still implicit. Thus, this study was conducted to examine the perception held by urban farmers and officials in Arusha city and the way such perceptions affect urban agricultural activities. The study adopted a qualitative research approach in order to gain the in-depth respondents’ opinions and perceptual information about urban agriculture. The case study strategy was deployed by this study because the perceptional thoughts held by respondents on urban agriculture depend on the actual situation through which agricultural activities took place. A total of 60 respondents were exhaustively interviewed. Other information was obtained through observation as well as reviewing literature. All data obtained were analyzed and interpreted based on their content. The findings revealed that some of the negative effects caused by urban agricultural activities influenced the negative perception people held on it. Those effects were seldom managed by officials from Arusha city authorities. However, some of those effects to the environment and urban development were evident, they were sometimes exaggerated due to the negative perception already existing in the city officials’ minds. The positive perception of urban agriculture existed only when its associated benefits met the interests of the urban farmers and city officials. The study concludes that, the positive or negative perceptions of urban agriculture has close a relationship with the livelihoods of the farmers and the employment needs of officials such as urban planners, environmental officers and agricultural officers. Despite urban agriculture being somehow acknowledged in the policy documents, the effects of negative perceptions among different stakeholders about urban agriculture are considered less crucial in the policy implication and other formal governmental proclamation. However, in the reality it is critical.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Institute of Human Settlements Studies, Ardhi University, Dares Salaam, Tanzania

  • Department of Urban and Regional Planning, School of Spatial Planning and Social Sciences, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

  • Sections